|
ECO-Blast is the Branded and
proprietary blast abrasive produced by Gemco
Minerals Inc.'s wholly owned subsidiary
Firstline Recovery Systems Inc. using magnetite
and magnetite blends from the properties it
either owns or partners with in British
Columbia, Canada.
Tests have shown ECO-Blast to
be an effective replacement for more traditional
blast mediums in terms of cost and performance
and significantly superior in terms of
environmental impact and recyclability
A number of comparison
demonstration have been conducted using
ECO-Blast and competitive/alternative products
and the results have been very positive.
Comparison Test - ECO-Blast vs. Copper Slag &
Nickel Slag*
Test Conditions
Tests were conducted by Ross
Rex Industrial Painters - Surrey, British
Columbia, using government ticketed Industrial
Painter Journeymen.
In all tests the equipment
used was the same, namely a 600 c.f.m. electric
compressor with a dryer, achieving approx. 85
psi at the end of a #7 nozzle. The blast pot was
equipped with a Schmidt valve.
The product blasted was a
tight adhering mill scale on mild steel with
some corrosion.
In each case 250 pounds of product was used,
with the same operator conducting each sample
test.
Results*
Copper Slag (250 pounds)
In 15 minutes the copper slag achieved 20 sq. ft
of a #10 near white blast. The profile was 4.2
mills
Nickel Slag (250 pounds)
In 25 minutes the nickel slag achieved 60 sq.
ft. of a #10 near white blast. The profile was
3.8 mill.
ECO-Blast (250 pounds)
In 24 minutes the Eco-Blast achieved 100 sq. ft.
of a #10 near white blast. The profile was 3.2
mills.
Added Test for Eco-Blast
The ECO-Blast abrasive was
tested on removing 80 plus mills of epoxy, an
exceptionally highly coated surface.
Results*
In 5 minutes the ECO-Blast
achieved 3 sq.ft (36 sq. ft/hr) of a #10 near
white blast. Neither nickel nor copper slag
would be appropriate for this application.
Conclusion*
The ECO-Blast showed superior
properties in all tests and offered the added
bonus of working well on coated, as well as,
uncoated substrates.

* These
blast tests were conducted using limited
quantities and under subjective conditions.
Firstline is undertaking a program of continuous
testing and evaluation and will post new
performance results as they become available.
Comparison Test - ECO-Blast vs. Stauolite*
Tests were conducted by Ross
Rex Industrial Painters - Surrey, British
Columbia using government ticketed Industrial
Painter Journeymen.
In all tests the equipment
used was the same, namely a 400 c.f.m. air
compressor with a dryer, achieving approx. 120
psi at the end of a #5 nozzle. The 300 pound
blast pot was equipped with a Schmidt valve.
The product blasted was a
tight mill scale on mild steel with no
corrosion.
Results*
Stauolite
In 7 minutes the Stauolite achieved 18 sq. ft of
a #10 near white blast. The profile was 2.8
mills
ECO-Blast
In 18 minutes the ECO-Blast achieved 39.2 sq. ft
of a #10 near white blast. The profile was 3.3
mills

* These
blast tests were conducted using limited
quantities and under subjective conditions.
Firstline is undertaking a program of continuous
testing and evaluation and will post new
performance results as they become available.
Field Test - National Association of Coatings
Engineers (NACE) represented by Mr. Brian
Guthrie*
All data was verified by Mr.
Brian Guthrie (NACE) inspector and consultant.
Mr. Guthrie has over 20 years in industrial
painting, much of this in the sand blasting
division.
All work was performed using
government ticketed Industrial Painter
Journeymen.
All tests were performed
using standard ECO-Blast abrasive.
In all tests the equipment
used was the same, namely a 400 c.f.m. air
compressor with a dryer, achieving approx. 120
psi at the end of a #5 nozzle. The 300 pound
blast pot was equipped with a Schmidt valve.
Observations and Conclusions
The abrasive at 400 c.f.m.
and 120 p.s.i. produced an SSPC #10 NACE #2 near
white blast with very little effort (one pass).
The air temperature was 9.7C, relative humidity
was 79.6%, dew point was 6.1C, and the steel
temperature was 12-13C.
The test was conducted on
grade1 steel with 90% mill scale and
approximately 10% surface rust.
"It is my opinion that
this material (ECO-Blast) is similar to
stauolite or garnet in terms of its performance
and speed."
"I am also given to
understand that its recycling capability is
analogous to stauolite and garnet products in
removing mill scale."
Brian Guthrie
* These
blast tests were conducted using limited
quantities and under subjective conditions.
Firstline is undertaking a program of continuous
testing and evaluation and will post new
performance results as they become available.
Comparison Pricing - ECO-Blast & Competitive
Products
| Prices per tonne
($CDN) |
| |
| |
Blast Medium |
Unit Price |
Delivered in Qty/Volume |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Copper Slag |
$ 254.92 |
80 pound bags |
| |
Nickel Slag |
$ 340.17 |
80 pound bags |
| |
Stauolite |
$ 335.00 |
70 pound bags |
| |
Garnet |
$ 494.80 |
55 pound bags |
| |
ECO-Blast |
$ 285.00 |
Bulk Bags |
Comparison Cost per Square Foot - ECO-Blast &
Competitive Products
| Cost per sq.ft.
($CDN) |
| |
| |
Blast Medium |
Amount |
Cutting Rates |
Time |
Cost/Sq.Ft |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Copper Slag |
100 lbs. |
8 sq. ft. |
6 min. |
$ 1.44 |
| |
Nickel Slag |
100 lbs. |
24 sq. ft. |
10 min. |
$ 0.644 |
| |
ECO-Blast |
100 lbs. |
44 sq. ft. |
9.6 min. |
$ 0.294 |
| |
Above
products used same blast equipment
with # 7 nozzle |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Stauolite |
100 lbs. |
51.3 sq. ft. |
19.95 min. |
$ 0.296 |
| |
ECO-Blast |
100 lbs. |
111.7 sq.
ft. |
45.60 min. |
$ 0.115 |
| |
Above
products used same blast equipment
with # 5 nozzle |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As
reported in the Comparison
Demonstrations - ECO-Blast (see
above) In the opinion of the
Independent National Association of
Coating Engineers (NACE) garnet is
similar in performance and speed to
ECO-Blast. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Garnet |
100 lbs. |
111.7 sq.ft. |
45.60 min. |
$ 0.201 |
| |
ECO-Blast |
100 lbs. |
111.7 sq.ft |
45.60 min. |
$ 0.115 |
|